Nevertheless, he continued, was tested and research methods considering the condition and type of forest in Indonesia which lies in the tropics is different from sub-tropical forest areas. Incentives offered by developed countries to compensate emissions reductions into an opportunity for Indonesia as a new commodity in the trading of carbon that must be done with the principle of mutual benefit. "The price offered compensation for the developed countries did not logging with a range of U.S. $ 5 to U.S. $ 10 per tonne CO2e, still far below fair compensation for YS $ 50 to U.S. $ 100 per tonne CO2e."
However, he added, the Indonesian Government efforts to reduce carbon emissions does not depend on the presence or absence of such compensation due to decreased emissions is important for Indonesia. "Even if there should not be compensated is a binding (legally binding) because of Indonesia on the position of developing nations and countries."
He said the Indonesian Government must be wary of corporate competition practices developed countries that sheltered behind environmental issues and climate change by using the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to attack the government's policy of developing countries.
For example, forest fires in Indonesia in 1997 until 2000 with the data still must be questioned, diisyukan as the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases after the United States and China. "Development of Timber and oil palm plantation development diisyukan as causes of increased emissions of greenhouse gases."
Some things are beneficial for developing countries related to the calculation of GHG emission reduction. First, the harvesting of timber plantations and carbon stock valued meningiatkam reduce GHG emissions, while deforestation in developed countries is not counted as emissions in applying the Reference Emission Level (REL).
Secondly, forest fires in Indonesia is considered as a producer of carbon emissions, while forest fires in developed countries is not calculated as proposed by reason of anthropogenic emissions. Third, development of oil palm plantations in the forest that APL has been reserved for agricultural and plantation land assessed as deforestation, but that's not true For the latest updates PRESS CTR + D or visit Stock Market news Today
No comments:
Post a Comment